Adolescent dating abuse prevention curriculum
This outcome was also assessed at 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year follow-up periods (Foshee et al., 2004). This cost includes the training manual, which is provided during the training.
Subgroup findings and follow-up findings are not rated and therefore do not contribute to the final outcome rating. The effects of the evidence-based Safe Dates dating abuse prevention program on other youth violence outcomes. While optional for implementation, the training is highly recommended by the program supplier.
Adolescents in the control group were exposed only to community activities, which included the provision of workshops to community service providers (e.g., social service, emergency room, crisis line, school counselors) and a weekly support group offered to victims of partner violence. Of the total sample, 51% were female, 19% were African American, and 77% were white. At both baseline and first follow up, about 70% of the adolescents reported dating, and of those dating at baseline, 35% of the girls and 38% of the boys reported being a victim of dating violence at least once.
Unhealthy relationships can begin as early as adolescence.
This difference was significant (Foshee et al., 2014). (1998): Psychological abuse victimization was measured by asking the respondents, “How often has anyone that you have ever been on a date with done the following things to you?
" Fourteen acts were listed (e.g., “damaged something that belonged to me” and “insulted me in front of others”). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program.
Based on one study and three measures, the average effect size for disruptive behavior disorders and externalizing/antisocial behaviors is .18 (95% CI: .10, .22). The Safe Dates program: One-year follow-up results. The five core components of the Safe Dates program are contained within the curriculum and are available for purchase online, at a cost of 5 per manual.
This outcome was also assessed at 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year follow-up periods (Foshee et al., 2004).