Dating violence history
Although these studies reveal domains of risk associated with TDV perpetration, it is challenging to translate these findings into a preventive framework.
Retention rates from wave 1 were the following: wave 2: 92.5%; wave 3: 85.8%; wave 4: 74.5%; wave 5: 67.0%; and wave 6: 72.7%.However, area under the curve (AUC) statistics may not adequately capture the incremental impact of additional indicators.Instead, reclassification analyses may be a more sensitive approach for determining whether a novel indicator should be included within a multi-indicator screening approach.Formal tests of incremental validity can help prioritize the most salient risk factors for TDV perpetration.
Traditionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) approaches are preferred to solely using regression-based techniques to determine the appropriateness of a screening protocol.
Adolescents responded with yes or no to questions about their own behavior in their lifetime (wave 1) and in the past year (wave 2–wave 6).