Free couples cybersex chatrooms
Following are brief descriptions of the different approaches to marital affairs. Family or Systems View: Infidelity, in this view, is seen as a "family affair" that must be understood and treated within the marital system rather than from an individual perspective.
They look carefully at the familial legacy of each partner and pay attention to the phases of the marriage, i.e., years of marriage, ages of children, empty nest phase, etc.Ignoring the fact that affairs are common and part human nature, their prescription for healing infidelity is that the "sinners" must fully confess and repeatedly atone before they can be forgiven by the victimized and betrayed spouses.The latter approach may be more harming than helping for couples in crisis as it often focuses on one-sided blame to the exclusion of the marital, sociological, evolutionary and technological (i.e. Another major misperception among lay people and psychotherapists is that extramarital relationships are never consensual and are always harming to the marital relationships. Barash & Lipton poignantly wrote in their book Clinton's assertion that he did not have sex with Monica raised the question of not only what sex is but also how marital affairs are defined and whether sex or intercourse are the defining factors in infidelity.
This has made it very difficult to comply with the Western-Judeo-Christian proscription.They also adopt theories and research generated by sociologists, anthropologists and evolutionary psychologists.However, some authors adopt a moralistic and rigid view of affairs.Their views on infidelity effect their rationales for the causes and significantly color their proposed solutions.