Is chris brown dating anyone singles dating queensland
Those which appear the most frequently in talk.origins are reproduced below: Note that these aren't necessarily the "best" or most difficult to refute of young-Earth arguments.
However, they are quite popular in modern creation-"science" literature (even though they should not be!
A plot is constructed of Pb-206/Pb-204 versus Pb-207/Pb-204.
If the solar system formed from a common pool of matter, which was uniformly distributed in terms of Pb isotope ratios, then the initial plots for all objects from that pool of matter would fall on a single point.
The actual underlying assumption is that, if those requirements have not been met, there is no reason for the data points to fall on a line.
This causes the data points to separate from each other.Note that young-Earthers cannot accuse us of selective use of data -- the above table includes a significant fraction of all meteorites on which isotope dating has been attempted. 286) , less than 100 meteorites have been subjected to isotope dating, and of those about 70 yield ages with low analytical error.Further, the oldest age determinations of individual meteorites generally give concordant ages by multiple radiometric means, or multiple tests across different samples.Unfortunately, the age cannot be computed directly from material that is solely from the Earth.
There is evidence that energy from the Earth's accumulation caused the surface to be molten.
he generally accepted age for the Earth and the rest of the solar system is about 4.55 billion years (plus or minus about 1%).