The ugly bug dating
Error output is as follows: Problem 1 - The requested package wpackagist-plugin/feedwordpress ~2016.1213 exists as wpackagist-plugin/feedwordpress[2016.1213, 2016.1211, 2016.0420, 2015.0514, 2015.0426, 2014.0805, 2013.0504, 2013.0503, 2012.1218, 2012.1212, 2011.1019, 2011.1018, 2011.0721, 2011.0706, 2011.0602, 2011.0531, 2011.0512, 2011.0211.2, 2011.0211, 2010.0905, 2010.0903, 2010.0623, 2010.0602, 2010.0531, 2010.0528, 2010.0127, 2009.1112, 2009.1111, 2009.0707, 2009.0618, 2009.0613, 2009.0612, 2008.1214, 2008.1105, 2008.1101, 2008.1030, 0.993, 0.992, 0.991, 0.981, 0.99, 0.98, 0.97, 0.96, 0.95, 0.91, 0.9, 0.8, dev-trunk] but these are rejected by your constraint.
Feed Word Press has many options which can be accessed through the Word Press Dashboard, and a lot of functionality accessible programmatically through Word Press templates or plugins.
If you syndicate several feeds then you can use Word Press’s posts database and templating engine as the back-end of an aggregation («planet») website.
It was developed, originally, as a utility/hobby project, because I needed a more flexible replacement for Planet for aggregator sites that I administered.
I’ve been using a different aggregator for a while, but it doesn’t have the flexibility of FWP: setting Category, Tags and custom fields per feed is awesome.
Hence, I’ve come back to using FWP, but not using the scheduling features, and taking it easy on the number of sources.Even if you just copy pasted your answer it wouldn't have took you longer to do so Please handle things in an efficient and logical way instead of complicating things by unnecessarily passing on stuff like that to your users And don't just close topics as "completed" in order to deactivate commenting (which is why i can't post this there) Hi there, Thank you very much for your comment.I am sorry that you feel we are not managing things as efficiently as possible.I’ve tried specifying the latest version, 2016/1213, as well as not specifying any version at all.